Celeron M 925 vs M 520

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	Intel Celeron M
Architecture codename	Merom (2006−2008)	Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$70

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Base clock speed	1.6 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.6 GHz	2.3 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	800 MHz
L2 cache	no data	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	no data
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Die size	no data	107 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	no data	410 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	0.95V-1.3V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PPGA478	PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 925 are enumerated here.

VT-x

-

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---