Xeon W-3175X vs Celeron J1800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.96
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Xeon W
Power efficiencyno data8.69
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)8 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$2,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed2.41 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data31
L1 cache112 KB1.75 MB
L2 cache1 MB28 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C85 °C
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt255 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB512 GB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidthno data128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes448

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1800 573
Xeon W-3175X 37167
+6386%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 8 October 2018
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 255 Watt

Celeron J1800 has 2450% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3175X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1800 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3175X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Xeon W-3175X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 532 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 118 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Xeon W-3175X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.