Atom x5-Z8330 vs Celeron J1800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36
Atom x5-Z8330
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.51
+41.7%

Atom x5-Z8330 outperforms Celeron J1800 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Atom x5-Z8330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30512883
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency3.41no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Airmont (2016)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Atom x5-Z8330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.41 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz1.92 GHz
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Atom x5-Z8330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Atom x5-Z8330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Atom x5-Z8330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Atom x5-Z8330 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Atom x5-Z8330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-RS 1600
Maximum memory size8 GB2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHz500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Atom x5-Z8330 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Atom x5-Z8330.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes41
USB revisionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1800 0.36
Atom x5-Z8330 0.51
+41.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1800 573
Atom x5-Z8330 809
+41.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 0.51
Recency 1 November 2013 8 February 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm

Atom x5-Z8330 has a 41.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Atom x5-Z8330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Atom x5-Z8330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Atom x5-Z8330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 539 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 9 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Atom x5-Z8330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.