MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreMediaTek Kompanio 500
Power efficiencyno data0.09
Architecture codenamePenryn-1M (2009)2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketP (478)no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2000 Watt

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2000 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 has 5614.3% lower power consumption.

MediaTek Kompanio 520, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and MediaTek Kompanio 520. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
MediaTek Kompanio 520
Kompanio 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 22 votes

Rate MediaTek Kompanio 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3000 or MediaTek Kompanio 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.