MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Aggregate performance score
MediaTek Kompanio 520 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3000 by a whopping 363% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2950 | 1923 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
| Power efficiency | 1.16 | 0.09 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn-1M (2009) | 2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55 |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | P (478) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 2000 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.43 | 1.99 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 2000 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 has 5614.3% lower power consumption.
MediaTek Kompanio 520, on the other hand, has a 362.8% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The MediaTek Kompanio 520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
