Celeron Dual-Core T3000: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3000
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 provides poor benchmark performance at 0.43% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

Intel started Celeron Dual-Core T3000 sales 1 May 2009. This is a Penryn-1M architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 45 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 1800 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is P (478) processor with a TDP of 35 Watt.

Primary details

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking2965
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency1.16of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U)
Architecture codenamePenryn-1M (2009)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Boost clock speed1.8 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
Bus rate800 MHz
L1 cache64 KBof 80 KB (EPYC 9965)
L2 cache1 MBof 2 MB (Xeon 6980P)
Chip lithography45 nmof 3 nm (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
Die size107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cof 110 °C (Atom x7-E3950)
Number of transistors410 Millionof 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketP (478)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattof 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Celeron Dual-Core T3000. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 687

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 1797

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 3329

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 1593

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Celeron Dual-Core T3000's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook CPUs.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is Turion 64 X2 TL-62, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 14 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Celeron Dual-Core T3000:

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 100

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Celeron Dual-Core T3000, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Celeron Dual-Core T3000 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 233 configurations using Celeron Dual-Core T3000 in our database.

All comparisons with Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.