Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-64

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-64
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29632967
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency1.171.17
Architecture codenameTrinidad (2006−2007)Penryn-1M (2009)
Release date13 April 2007 (17 years ago)1 May 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size147 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistors154 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1P (478)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 0.43
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 692
+0.7%
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 687

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1726
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 1797
+4.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 3201
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 3329
+4%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1518
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 1593
+4.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2007 1 May 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-64 or Celeron Dual-Core T3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.