Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs Athlon II N330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II N330
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43
+2.4%

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 outperforms Athlon II N330 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II N330 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29852962
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon IIIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency1.131.16
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Penryn-1M (2009)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)1 May 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II N330 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size117.5 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors234 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II N330 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1P (478)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II N330 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II N330 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II N330 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II N330 0.42
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 0.43
+2.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II N330 665
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 687
+3.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon II N330 1999
+11.2%
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 1797

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon II N330 3837
+15.3%
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 3329

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon II N330 1943
+22%
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 1593

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.43
Recency 12 May 2010 1 May 2009

Athlon II N330 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000, on the other hand, has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon II N330 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II N330 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II N330
Athlon II N330
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Athlon II N330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II N330 or Celeron Dual-Core T3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.