Celeron 725C vs C-30
Primary details
Comparing C-30 and Celeron 725C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-30 and Celeron 725C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on C-30 and Celeron 725C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | Intel BGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-30 and Celeron 725C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 40 nm, 1.24-1.35V | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-30 and Celeron 725C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-30 and Celeron 725C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 1 July 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 17 Watt |
C-30 has 88.9% lower power consumption.
Celeron 725C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between C-30 and Celeron 725C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-30 and Celeron 725C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
