C-30 vs Atom E3815

Place in the ranking	3364	3371
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Atom	AMD C-Series
Power efficiency	2.27	1.16
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-I (2013)	Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)	4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$134	no data

Detailed specifications

Atom E3815 and C-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Boost clock speed	1.47 GHz	1.2 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	512 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	22 nm	40 nm
Die size	no data	75 mm²
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Atom E3815 and C-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	Intel BGA1170	FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3815 and C-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	40 nm, 1.24-1.35V
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E3815 and C-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3815 and C-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare

Intel HD Graphics

AMD Radeon HD 6250

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom E3815 0.12
+9.1%

C-30 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom E3815 184
+3.4%

C-30 178

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.12	0.11
Integrated graphics card	0.77	0.24
Recency	8 October 2013	4 January 2011
Chip lithography	22 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	9 Watt

Atom E3815 has a 9.1% higher aggregate performance score, 220.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 81.8% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom E3815 and C-30.

Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3815 and C-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.