PRO A12-9830B vs Atom N475
Primary details
Comparing Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Atom | AMD Bristol Ridge |
Architecture codename | Pineview (2009−2011) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 1 June 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2048 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 66 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 90 °C |
Number of transistors | 123 million | 3100 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCBGA559 | FP4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 25-45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | FMA4 |
AVX | - | AVX |
FRTC | - | + |
FreeSync | - | + |
PowerTune | - | + |
TrueAudio | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
Out-of-band client management | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
RAID | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | - | no data |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3, DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel GMA 3150 | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 June 2010 | 1 June 2016 |
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
Atom N475 has 316.7% lower power consumption.
PRO A12-9830B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N475 and PRO A12-9830B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.