Pentium Dual T4500 vs Celeron M 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 560
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.34
Pentium Dual Core T4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.84
+147%

Pentium Dual Core T4500 outperforms Celeron M 560 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 560 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30782584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency1.072.27
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 560 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 560 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478P
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium Dual Core T4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium Dual Core T4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 560 0.34
Pentium Dual T4500 0.84
+147%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 560 535
Pentium Dual T4500 1336
+150%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 560 2008
Pentium Dual T4500 2331
+16.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron M 560 2008
Pentium Dual T4500 4337
+116%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.84
Recency 1 May 2008 1 January 2010
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 560 has 16.7% lower power consumption.

Pentium Dual T4500, on the other hand, has a 147.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Pentium Dual Core T4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Pentium Dual Core T4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
Pentium Dual Core T4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 441 vote

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 560 or Pentium Dual Core T4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.