C-30 vs Atom N475

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N475 and C-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD C-Series
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date1 June 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N475 and C-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.83 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size66 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors123 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N475 and C-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N475 and C-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE340 nm, 1.24-1.35V
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N475 and C-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N475 and C-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N475 and C-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150AMD Radeon HD 6250

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N475 179
+0.6%
C-30 178

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom N475 544
+35%
C-30 403

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 4 January 2011
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 9 Watt

Atom N475 has 100% more threads, and 50% lower power consumption.

C-30, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N475 and C-30. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N475 and C-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N475
Atom N475
AMD C-30
C-30

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate Atom N475 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 18 votes

Rate C-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N475 or C-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.