Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs A6-9220e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9220e
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.64
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.42
+2778%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms A6-9220e by a whopping 2778% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9220e and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2771341
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency9.7347.99
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 June 2017 (7 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9220e and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.6 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache160 KB512 KB
L2 cache1 MB8 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size124.5 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-9220e and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGAFP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220e and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220e and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220e and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon 780M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9220e 0.64
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 18.42
+2778%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9220e 977
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28187
+2785%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A6-9220e 86
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2360
+2644%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

A6-9220e 31
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 275
+787%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 18.42
Integrated graphics card 1.17 18.28
Recency 1 June 2017 13 June 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

A6-9220e has 483.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, on the other hand, has a 2778.1% higher aggregate performance score, 1462.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220e and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 314 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 45 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220e or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.