Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs Xbox Series X GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameScarlettLiverpool 16nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)7 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33281152
Core clock speed1825 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors15,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate379.657.60
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs20872

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Length301 mm288 mm
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount10 GB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth560.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1*
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.21.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2020 7 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 75 Watt

Xbox Series X GPU has an age advantage of 4 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 4 Slim GPU, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xbox Series X GPU and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Xbox Series X GPU
Xbox Series X GPU
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1224 votes

Rate Xbox Series X GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 127 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.