UHD Graphics P750 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with UHD Graphics P750, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.72
+3.5%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics P750 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking639647
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.93
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32256
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data83.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
1440p28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
4K12
+20%
10−12
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Hitman 3 10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Metro Exodus 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Hitman 3 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Metro Exodus 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Hitman 3 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hitman 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and UHD Graphics P750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 6% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 4% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 20% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 4.56
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 3.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and UHD Graphics P750.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics P750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Intel UHD Graphics P750
UHD Graphics P750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 64 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.