T600 vs UHD Graphics 750
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 750 with T600, including specs and performance data.
T600 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 275% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 669 | 334 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 20.69 | 29.08 |
Architecture | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) | Turing (2018−2022) |
GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | TU117 |
Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) | 6 May 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1335 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+++ | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 53.40 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.6656 TFLOPS | 1.709 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 8 | 32 |
TMUs | 16 | 40 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 14−16
−279%
| 53
+279%
|
1440p | 6−7
−333%
| 26
+333%
|
4K | 5−6
−320%
| 21
+320%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−190%
|
27−30
+190%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−315%
|
50−55
+315%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−190%
|
27−30
+190%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−261%
|
65
+261%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 8−9
−463%
|
45−50
+463%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
−360%
|
45−50
+360%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
−186%
|
40−45
+186%
|
Valorant | 12−14
−467%
|
65−70
+467%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−315%
|
50−55
+315%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−190%
|
27−30
+190%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
−471%
|
80
+471%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−317%
|
96
+317%
|
Fortnite | 24−27
−254%
|
90−95
+254%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−183%
|
51
+183%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 8−9
−463%
|
45−50
+463%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−321%
|
59
+321%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−203%
|
110−120
+203%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
−186%
|
40−45
+186%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−247%
|
50−55
+247%
|
Valorant | 12−14
−467%
|
65−70
+467%
|
World of Tanks | 75−80
−179%
|
200−210
+179%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−315%
|
50−55
+315%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−190%
|
27−30
+190%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−157%
|
55−60
+157%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−150%
|
45
+150%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 8−9
−463%
|
45−50
+463%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−203%
|
110−120
+203%
|
Valorant | 12−14
−467%
|
65−70
+467%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 4−5
−575%
|
27
+575%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−575%
|
27
+575%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
−433%
|
160−170
+433%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−400%
|
14−16
+400%
|
World of Tanks | 30−35
−266%
|
110−120
+266%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−467%
|
30−35
+467%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−330%
|
40−45
+330%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−433%
|
32
+433%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7
−333%
|
24−27
+333%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
−1800%
|
35−40
+1800%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−229%
|
21−24
+229%
|
Valorant | 12−14
−231%
|
40−45
+231%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 16−18
−47.1%
|
25
+47.1%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−56.3%
|
25
+56.3%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−285%
|
50−55
+285%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−267%
|
10−12
+267%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−56.3%
|
25
+56.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
Fortnite | 3−4
−567%
|
20−22
+567%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−500%
|
18
+500%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−550%
|
12−14
+550%
|
Valorant | 4−5
−375%
|
18−20
+375%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 111
+0%
|
111
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 8
+0%
|
8
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 750 and T600 compete in popular games:
- T600 is 279% faster in 1080p
- T600 is 333% faster in 1440p
- T600 is 320% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 is 1800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- T600 is ahead in 51 test (80%)
- there's a draw in 13 tests (20%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.36 | 16.34 |
Recency | 30 March 2021 | 6 May 2021 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
UHD Graphics 750 has 166.7% lower power consumption.
T600, on the other hand, has a 274.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop card while T600 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.