Radeon Vega 7 vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in the ranking	662	533
Place by popularity	not in top-100	12
Power efficiency	20.70	11.44
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	Cezanne
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	448
Core clock speed	300 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	53.20
Floating-point processing power	0.6656 TFLOPS	1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	IGP
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	12−14 −91.7%	23 +91.7%
1440p	14−16 −78.6%	25 +78.6%
4K	9−10 −66.7%	15 +66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Elden Ring	10−12 −27.3%	14 +27.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −52.6%	29 +52.6%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −110%	21 +110%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −92.9%	27 +92.9%
Valorant	9−10 −222%	29 +222%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Dota 2	14−16 −21.4%	17 +21.4%
Elden Ring	10−12 −45.5%	16 +45.5%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −21.7%	28 +21.7%
Fortnite	24−27 −69.2%	40−45 +69.2%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −26.3%	24 +26.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −50%	15 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −17.9%	46 +17.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −53.3%	21−24 +53.3%
Valorant	9−10 −55.6%	14 +55.6%
World of Tanks	75−80 +29.3%	58 −29.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −43.5%	30−35 +43.5%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −10.5%	21 +10.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%
Valorant	9−10 −178%	25 +178%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Elden Ring	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
World of Tanks	30−35 −68.8%	50−55 +68.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Valorant	12−14 −46.2%	18−20 +46.2%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Elden Ring	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Metro Exodus	0−1	3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −69.2%	21−24 +69.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Fortnite	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Valorant	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

Vega 7 is 92% faster in 1080p
Vega 7 is 79% faster in 1440p
Vega 7 is 67% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 29% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Vega 7 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games: