UHD Graphics 770 vs T600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T600 with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

T600
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
16.34
+173%

T600 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking334590
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.0828.38
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU117Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640256
Core clock speed735 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1335 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate53.4026.40
Floating-point processing power1.709 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T600 16.34
+173%
UHD Graphics 770 5.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 6486
+538%
UHD Graphics 770 1016

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T600 8694
UHD Graphics 770 16443
+89.1%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T600 344838
+12888%
UHD Graphics 770 2655

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T600 6552
+91.1%
UHD Graphics 770 3428

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T600 40917
UHD Graphics 770 119185
+191%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
+194%
18
−194%
1440p26
+189%
9−10
−189%
4K21
+50%
14
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+175%
12
−175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+184%
18−20
−184%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+560%
5
−560%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+183%
23
−183%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Valorant 65−70
+325%
16
−325%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+184%
18−20
−184%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+383%
6
−383%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%
Dota 2 80
+300%
20
−300%
Far Cry 5 96
+220%
30
−220%
Fortnite 90−95
+156%
35−40
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 51
+183%
18
−183%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+556%
9
−556%
Metro Exodus 10
−60%
16−18
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+131%
50−55
−131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+174%
18−20
−174%
Valorant 65−70
+240%
20−22
−240%
World of Tanks 200−210
+115%
95−100
−115%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+184%
18−20
−184%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%
Dota 2 111
+178%
40
−178%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+181%
16
−181%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+131%
50−55
−131%
Valorant 65−70
+240%
20−22
−240%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Dota 2 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
Grand Theft Auto V 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+344%
35−40
−344%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
World of Tanks 110−120
+166%
40−45
−166%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+231%
12−14
−231%
Forza Horizon 4 32
+191%
10−12
−191%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Valorant 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Dota 2 25
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Metro Exodus 8
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 40
+186%
14
−186%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Fortnite 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 18
+200%
6−7
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Valorant 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%

This is how T600 and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • T600 is 194% faster in 1080p
  • T600 is 189% faster in 1440p
  • T600 is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T600 is 700% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 60% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 is ahead in 60 tests (98%)
  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.34 5.98
Recency 6 May 2021 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

T600 has a 173.2% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that T600 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T600
T600
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 685 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1297 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about T600 or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.