Quadro T1200 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 750

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 750 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 750
2021
15 Watt
4.51

T1200 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 331% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking662291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.7074.38
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed300 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate20.8091.20
Floating-point processing power0.6656 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−383%
58
+383%
1440p7−8
−371%
33
+371%
4K18−20
−350%
81
+350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Elden Ring 10−12
−382%
53
+382%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−377%
60−65
+377%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−332%
80−85
+332%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Valorant 9−10
−767%
75−80
+767%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−377%
60−65
+377%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Dota 2 14−16
−714%
114
+714%
Elden Ring 10−12
−245%
38
+245%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−157%
59
+157%
Fortnite 24−27
−296%
100−110
+296%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−332%
80−85
+332%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−407%
71
+407%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−420%
50−55
+420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−238%
130−140
+238%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−373%
71
+373%
Valorant 9−10
−767%
75−80
+767%
World of Tanks 75−80
−204%
220−230
+204%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−377%
60−65
+377%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−143%
56
+143%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−332%
80−85
+332%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−238%
130−140
+238%
Valorant 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Elden Ring 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−1133%
37
+1133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
World of Tanks 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−310%
41
+310%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Valorant 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Elden Ring 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−106%
30−35
+106%
Metro Exodus 0−1 14−16
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−106%
30−35
+106%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Fortnite 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Valorant 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Elden Ring 47
+0%
47
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 383% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 371% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 350% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 1133% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 35 tests (63%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (38%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.51 19.45
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 18 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 20% lower power consumption.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 331.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 401 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 144 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.