Arc A770 vs UHD Graphics 750

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 750 and Arc A770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 750
2021
15 Watt
4.50

Arc A770 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 654% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking661155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.32
Power efficiency20.5710.34
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564096
Core clock speed300 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate20.80614.4
Floating-point processing power0.6656 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.50
Arc A770 33.93
+654%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 750 1733
Arc A770 13075
+654%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−729%
116
+729%
1440p8−9
−713%
65
+713%
4K5−6
−720%
41
+720%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.84
1440pno data5.06
4Kno data8.02

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−442%
65
+442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−2200%
92
+2200%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−430%
50−55
+430%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−556%
55−60
+556%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−458%
65−70
+458%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−432%
140−150
+432%
Hitman 3 10−11
−420%
50−55
+420%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−293%
110−120
+293%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1340%
144
+1340%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−458%
65−70
+458%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−418%
85−90
+418%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−139%
100−110
+139%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−158%
31
+158%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1875%
79
+1875%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−430%
50−55
+430%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−556%
55−60
+556%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−458%
65−70
+458%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−432%
140−150
+432%
Hitman 3 10−11
−420%
50−55
+420%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−293%
110−120
+293%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1340%
144
+1340%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−458%
65−70
+458%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1418%
258
+1418%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−229%
55−60
+229%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−139%
100−110
+139%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−275%
45
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1700%
72
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−430%
50−55
+430%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−556%
55−60
+556%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+21.7%
23
−21.7%
Hitman 3 10−11
−420%
50−55
+420%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−303%
121
+303%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1171%
216
+1171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−324%
72
+324%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−68.2%
74
+68.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−458%
65−70
+458%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−513%
45−50
+513%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−457%
35−40
+457%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−900%
40
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1750%
140−150
+1750%
Hitman 3 9−10
−244%
30−35
+244%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−900%
100
+900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9000%
91
+9000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1400%
60
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−418%
140−150
+418%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−438%
40−45
+438%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−4300%
130−140
+4300%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−8200%
83
+8200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 73

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−900%
30
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1800%
38
+1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−167%
8
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−3600%
37
+3600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158
+0%
158
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 89
+0%
89
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 729% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 713% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 720% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 22% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A770 is 9000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • Arc A770 is ahead in 61 test (86%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.50 33.93
Recency 30 March 2021 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 654% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 390 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5320 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.