Arc A750 vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in the ranking	665	181
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	56.39
Power efficiency	20.67	9.75
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	DG2-512
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	3584
Core clock speed	300 MHz	2050 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	537.6
Floating-point processing power	0.6656 TFLOPS	17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	112
TMUs	16	224
Tensor Cores	no data	448
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.30

Arc A750 30.42
+607%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 750 1733

Arc A750 12250
+607%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −679%	109 +679%
1440p	8−9 −638%	59 +638%
4K	5−6 −620%	36 +620%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.65
1440p	no data	4.90
4K	no data	8.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

10−11

−810%

91
+810%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −608%	90−95 +608%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −780%	88 +780%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −1400%	285 +1400%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −938%	80−85 +938%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −1060%	116 +1060%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −371%	65−70 +371%
Valorant	12−14 −958%	120−130 +958%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −608%	90−95 +608%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −660%	76 +660%
Dota 2	14−16 −607%	99 +607%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −196%	68 +196%
Fortnite	24−27 −473%	140−150 +473%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −1158%	239 +1158%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −938%	80−85 +938%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −607%	99 +607%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −840%	94 +840%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −367%	180−190 +367%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −371%	65−70 +371%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −620%	100−110 +620%
Valorant	12−14 −958%	120−130 +958%
World of Tanks	75−80 −268%	270−280 +268%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −608%	90−95 +608%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −650%	75 +650%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −283%	85−90 +283%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −947%	199 +947%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −938%	80−85 +938%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −367%	180−190 +367%
Valorant	12−14 −958%	120−130 +958%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 −925%	41 +925%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 −925%	41 +925%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
World of Tanks	30−35 −541%	200−210 +541%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −933%	60−65 +933%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2317%	145 +2317%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −767%	50−55 +767%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −4200%	86 +4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −714%	57 +714%
Valorant	12−14 −608%	90−95 +608%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Dota 2	16−18 −181%	45 +181%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −181%	45 +181%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −4200%	43 +4200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −669%	100−105 +669%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −181%	45 +181%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −40%	14 +40%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −780%	40−45 +780%
Fortnite	3−4 −1300%	40−45 +1300%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2700%	84 +2700%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Valorant	4−5 −1075%	45−50 +1075%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

Arc A750 is 679% faster in 1080p
Arc A750 is 638% faster in 1440p
Arc A750 is 620% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A750 is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Arc A750 surpassed UHD Graphics 750 in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.30	30.42
Recency	30 March 2021	12 October 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	225 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 607.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.