GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.02

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking447205
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Power efficiencyno data24.33
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962560
Core clock speedno data735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1035 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data82.80
Floating-point processing powerno data5.299 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data80
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.02
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.28
+162%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360
+167%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−178%
75
+178%
1440p16−18
−169%
43
+169%
4K10−12
−170%
27
+170%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−165%
80−85
+165%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−155%
50−55
+155%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−152%
55−60
+152%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−121%
140−150
+121%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−113%
110−120
+113%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−263%
98
+263%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−166%
85−90
+166%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−165%
80−85
+165%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−155%
50−55
+155%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−152%
55−60
+152%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−121%
140−150
+121%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−113%
110−120
+113%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−268%
114
+268%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−189%
78
+189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−228%
105
+228%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−152%
55−60
+152%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−121%
140−150
+121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−92.3%
50
+92.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−164%
27−30
+164%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−225%
140−150
+225%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−205%
120−130
+205%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−488%
47
+488%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−314%
29
+314%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−183%
30−35
+183%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Hitman 3 80
+0%
80
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 231
+0%
231
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35
+0%
35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Hitman 3 77
+0%
77
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 203
+0%
203
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+0%
26
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Hitman 3 67
+0%
67
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
+0%
92
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90
+0%
90
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
+0%
28
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+0%
81
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+0%
26
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Hitman 3 46
+0%
46
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+0%
61
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 139
+0%
139
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 56
+0%
56
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 20
+0%
20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
+0%
34
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10
+0%
10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 178% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 169% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 170% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 488% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 33 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.02 26.28
Recency 15 August 2020 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has a 162.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4127 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.