GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GTX 1070 Mobile GTX 1070 Max-Q GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.39
+282%

TITAN V outperforms GTX 1050 Mobile by a whopping 282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V TITAN V
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking79409
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.2910.73
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGV100GP107B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120640
Core clock speed1200 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate465.659.72
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS1.911 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs32040
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4000 MB
Memory bus width3072 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI+-
HDCP-2.2
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GPU Boostno data3.0
Anselno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA7.0+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p270−280
+270%
73
−270%
Full HD170−180
+270%
46
−270%
1440p152
+533%
24
−533%
4K82
+447%
15
−447%

Cost per frame, $

1080p17.64no data
1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
+0%
37
+0%
Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+0%
38
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+0%
55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+0%
30
+0%
Battlefield 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+0%
33
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+0%
52
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+0%
18
+0%
Battlefield 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+0%
17
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
+0%
13
+0%
Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+0%
24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
+0%
8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
+0%
7
+0%
Battlefield 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Far Cry 5 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
+0%
11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%

This is how TITAN V and GTX 1050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 270% faster in 900p
  • TITAN V is 270% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 533% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 447% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.39 11.63
Recency 7 December 2017 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4000 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

TITAN V has a 281.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 207.2% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1050 Mobile, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
GTX 1170 GeForce GTX 1170
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Cloverview Cloverview
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Iris Xe Graphics G4
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3080 Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 6900 Radeon RX 6900

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3284 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1207 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.