Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Vega Frontier Edition with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, including specs and performance data.

Vega Frontier Edition
2017
16 GB HBM2, 300 Watt
34.28
+728%

Vega Frontier Edition outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P6300 by a whopping 728% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking149684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.67no data
Power efficiency7.9619.24
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameVega 10Broadwell GT3e
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096384
Core clock speed1382 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate409.638.40
Floating-point processing power13.11 TFLOPS0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs646
TMUs25648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed945 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Vega Frontier Edition 34.28
+728%
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 4.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Vega Frontier Edition 13225
+727%
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1599

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.28 4.14
Recency 27 June 2017 5 September 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 15 Watt

Vega Frontier Edition has a 728% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is a workstation graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 25 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.