RTX A1000 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

Place in the ranking	320	222
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.70	28.24
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	2048
Core clock speed	1063 MHz	630 MHz
Boost clock speed	1190 MHz	1140 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	114.2	72.96
Floating-point processing power	3.656 TFLOPS	4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	96	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	204.8 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GH 17.06

RTX A1000 Mobile 24.72
+44.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GH 6572

RTX A1000 Mobile 9527
+45%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega M GH 14302

RTX A1000 Mobile 15135
+5.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega M GH 10248

RTX A1000 Mobile 11321
+10.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega M GH 59162

RTX A1000 Mobile 70880
+19.8%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega M GH 2908

RTX A1000 Mobile 4256
+46.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	59 −16.9%	69 +16.9%
1440p	37 +37%	27 −37%
4K	29 −37.9%	40−45 +37.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−56.4%

61
+56.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	44 −15.9%	50−55 +15.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −78.6%	50 +78.6%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −33.9%	75−80 +33.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	36 −30.6%	45−50 +30.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 −66.7%	50 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −32.5%	50−55 +32.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	52 −17.3%	60−65 +17.3%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −26.9%	130−140 +26.9%
Hitman 3	30−35 −39.4%	45−50 +39.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −27.1%	100−110 +27.1%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −36.2%	75−80 +36.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 −56.4%	60−65 +56.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	83 +7.8%	75−80 −7.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −17.9%	95−100 +17.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −34.2%	50−55 +34.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −17.9%	33 +17.9%
Battlefield 5	33 −127%	75−80 +127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	32 −46.9%	45−50 +46.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 −60.9%	37 +60.9%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −32.5%	50−55 +32.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 −48.8%	60−65 +48.8%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −26.9%	130−140 +26.9%
Hitman 3	30−35 −39.4%	45−50 +39.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −27.1%	100−110 +27.1%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −36.2%	75−80 +36.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	48 −27.1%	60−65 +27.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	68 −27.9%	87 +27.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −28.2%	50−55 +28.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −17.9%	95−100 +17.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21 −143%	50−55 +143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +12%	25 −12%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21 −124%	45−50 +124%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 −26.1%	29 +26.1%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −32.5%	50−55 +32.5%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −26.9%	130−140 +26.9%
Hitman 3	30−35 −39.4%	45−50 +39.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	56 −92.9%	100−110 +92.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 −33.3%	76 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	34 −26.5%	43 +26.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +223%	26 −223%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−118%

60−65
+118%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	39 −12.8%	40−45 +12.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −57.1%	22 +57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	13 −100%	24−27 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −35%	27−30 +35%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −42.4%	130−140 +42.4%
Hitman 3	20−22 −35%	27−30 +35%
Horizon Zero Dawn	41 −14.6%	45−50 +14.6%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −38.7%	40−45 +38.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −48.5%	45−50 +48.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −47.4%	27−30 +47.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −28.2%	130−140 +28.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−35.7%

35−40
+35.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18 −27.8%	21−24 +27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	14 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Hitman 3	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −36.8%	110−120 +36.8%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −52.9%	24−27 +52.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −34.8%	30−35 +34.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−33.3%

20−22
+33.3%

This is how RX Vega M GH and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A1000 Mobile is 17% faster in 1080p
RX Vega M GH is 37% faster in 1440p
RTX A1000 Mobile is 38% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega M GH is 223% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX Vega M GH is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
RTX A1000 Mobile is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.06	24.72
Recency	1 February 2018	30 March 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	60 Watt

RTX A1000 Mobile has a 44.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX A1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GH in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.