A10G vs GeForce4 Ti 4600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 Ti 4600 with A10G, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 Ti 4600
2002
128 MB DDR
0.01

A10G outperforms GeForce4 Ti 4600 by a whopping 485800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking150368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.21
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV25 A3GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 February 2002 (22 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data9216
Core clock speed300 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistors63 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400492.5
Floating-point processing powerno data31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8288
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length216 mm267 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed324 MHz1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.37 GB/s600.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 Ti 4600 0.01
A10G 48.59
+485800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 Ti 4600 5
A10G 18723
+374360%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 48.59
Recency 6 February 2002 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

A10G has a 485800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 Ti 4600 is a desktop card while A10G is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600
GeForce4 Ti 4600
NVIDIA A10G
A10G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 20 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 40 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.