Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6800M

Place in the ranking	148	285
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	16.53	75.31
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 22	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	31 May 2021 (3 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	1024
Core clock speed	2116 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	2390 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	145 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	382.4	91.20
Floating-point processing power	12.24 TFLOPS	2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	160	64
Ray Tracing Cores	40	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6800M 34.38
+76.9%

T1200 Mobile 19.44

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6800M 40391
+181%

T1200 Mobile 14387

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6800M 77244
+75%

T1200 Mobile 44135

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6800M 34199
+237%

T1200 Mobile 10134

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6800M 160859
+216%

T1200 Mobile 50827

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	109 +87.9%	58 −87.9%
1440p	74 +124%	33 −124%
4K	44 −84.1%	81 +84.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

123
+284%

30−35

−284%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +68.2%	40−45 −68.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	109 +132%	47 −132%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +70.8%	65−70 −70.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +75%	40−45 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	110 +244%	30−35 −244%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +16.9%	65 −16.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +62.3%	50−55 −62.3%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +44.7%	120−130 −44.7%
Hitman 3	70−75 +84.6%	35−40 −84.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +147%	60 −147%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +90%	60−65 −90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	98 +84.9%	50−55 −84.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +107%	59 −107%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +124%	54 −124%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +68.2%	40−45 −68.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90 +221%	28 −221%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +70.8%	65−70 −70.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +75%	40−45 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	102 +219%	30−35 −219%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +28.8%	59 −28.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +62.3%	50−55 −62.3%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +44.7%	120−130 −44.7%
Hitman 3	70−75 +84.6%	35−40 −84.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +215%	47 −215%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +65.2%	65−70 −65.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	83 +56.6%	50−55 −56.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	211 +380%	44 −380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +1.4%	71 −1.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +157%	47 −157%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +68.2%	40−45 −68.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 +271%	21 −271%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +100%	35−40 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	98 +206%	30−35 −206%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +35.7%	56 −35.7%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +44.7%	120−130 −44.7%
Hitman 3	70−75 +80%	40−45 −80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	172 +81.1%	95−100 −81.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180 +80%	100−105 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	109 +195%	37 −195%
Watch Dogs: Legion	69 +263%	19 −263%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

94
+88%

50−55

−88%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +85.7%	35−40 −85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +92.6%	27−30 −92.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +85%	20−22 −85%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	63 +250%	18 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	51 +325%	12−14 −325%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −2.5%	41 +2.5%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +77.5%	110−120 −77.5%
Hitman 3	40−45 +79.2%	24−27 −79.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	127 +81.4%	70−75 −81.4%
Metro Exodus	83 +84.4%	45−50 −84.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	145 +81.3%	80−85 −81.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +95.8%	24−27 −95.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170−180 +1375%	12 −1375%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

93
+86%

50−55

−86%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Hitman 3	56 +273%	14−16 −273%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +61.2%	100−110 −61.2%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +100%	21−24 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60 +200%	20−22 −200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +280%	10−11 −280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 +475%	4−5 −475%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +74.1%	27−30 −74.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	77 +92.5%	40−45 −92.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	33 +313%	8−9 −313%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50
+85.2%

27−30

−85.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Hitman 3	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 +0%	32 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

This is how RX 6800M and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

RX 6800M is 88% faster in 1080p
RX 6800M is 124% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 84% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800M is 1375% faster.
in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 3% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6800M is ahead in 51 test (75%)
T1200 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.38	19.44
Recency	31 May 2021	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	145 Watt	18 Watt

RX 6800M has a 76.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has 705.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6800M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.