Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600M with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
35.67
+83.9%

RX 6600M outperforms T1200 Mobile by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.7074.64
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921024
Core clock speed2068 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate270.691.20
Floating-point processing power8.659 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11264
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600M 35.67
+83.9%
T1200 Mobile 19.40

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6600M 31868
+122%
T1200 Mobile 14387

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6600M 72686
+64.7%
T1200 Mobile 44135

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6600M 23525
+132%
T1200 Mobile 10134

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600M 144612
+185%
T1200 Mobile 50827

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
+69%
58
−69%
1440p55
+66.7%
33
−66.7%
4K31
−161%
81
+161%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 110
+244%
30−35
−244%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 108
+145%
40−45
−145%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95
+102%
47
−102%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+76.9%
65−70
−76.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+181%
30−35
−181%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+20%
65
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+67.9%
50−55
−67.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+48%
120−130
−48%
Hitman 3 75−80
+92.3%
35−40
−92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+152%
60
−152%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+93.3%
60−65
−93.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+60.4%
50−55
−60.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+115%
59
−115%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+128%
54
−128%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 199
+352%
40−45
−352%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+182%
28
−182%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+76.9%
65−70
−76.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 72
+125%
30−35
−125%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+32.2%
59
−32.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+67.9%
50−55
−67.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+48%
120−130
−48%
Hitman 3 75−80
+92.3%
35−40
−92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+221%
47
−221%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+68.1%
65−70
−68.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+60.4%
50−55
−60.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
+293%
44
−293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+4.2%
71
−4.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+162%
47
−162%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
+79.5%
40−45
−79.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+229%
21
−229%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+106%
35−40
−106%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+90.6%
30−35
−90.6%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+39.3%
56
−39.3%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+36.6%
120−130
−36.6%
Hitman 3 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 134
+91.4%
70−75
−91.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 153
+91.3%
80−85
−91.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+130%
37
−130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
+211%
19
−211%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+100%
27−30
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+155%
20−22
−155%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
+189%
18
−189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+200%
12−14
−200%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+82%
110−120
−82%
Hitman 3 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 98
+96%
50−55
−96%
Metro Exodus 85
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
+100%
50−55
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+107%
30−33
−107%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+1408%
12
−1408%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Hitman 3 27−30
+93.3%
14−16
−93.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+65%
100−110
−65%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+110%
21−24
−110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+120%
20−22
−120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
+142%
12−14
−142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
+170%
10−11
−170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+174%
27−30
−174%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52
+92.6%
27−30
−92.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+163%
8−9
−163%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how RX 6600M and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is 69% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600M is 67% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 161% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600M is 1408% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is ahead in 51 test (75%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.67 19.40
Recency 31 May 2021 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 18 Watt

RX 6600M has a 83.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has 455.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 984 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 135 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.