Radeon RX 6300 vs Arc A580

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A580 and Radeon RX 6300, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A580
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
31.00
+111%

Arc A580 outperforms RX 6300 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking182357
Place by popularity84not in top-100
Power efficiency12.1931.60
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 October 2023 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072768
Core clock speed1700 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate384.097.92
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs19248
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.02x HDMI 2.1
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A580 31.00
+111%
RX 6300 14.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A580 11916
+111%
RX 6300 5648

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+129%
45−50
−129%
1440p55
+129%
24−27
−129%
4K33
+136%
14−16
−136%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 98
+118%
45−50
−118%
Elden Ring 81
+131%
35−40
−131%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+125%
40−45
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+137%
35−40
−137%
Forza Horizon 4 258
+115%
120−130
−115%
Metro Exodus 134
+123%
60−65
−123%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
Valorant 120−130
+125%
55−60
−125%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+125%
40−45
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+111%
35−40
−111%
Dota 2 86
+115%
40−45
−115%
Elden Ring 100−110
+133%
45−50
−133%
Far Cry 5 63
+133%
27−30
−133%
Fortnite 140−150
+125%
65−70
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 214
+114%
100−105
−114%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+115%
40−45
−115%
Metro Exodus 97
+116%
45−50
−116%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+124%
80−85
−124%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+133%
45−50
−133%
Valorant 120−130
+125%
55−60
−125%
World of Tanks 270−280
+112%
130−140
−112%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+125%
40−45
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+123%
30−33
−123%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+115%
40−45
−115%
Forza Horizon 4 177
+121%
80−85
−121%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+124%
80−85
−124%
Valorant 120−130
+125%
55−60
−125%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
Elden Ring 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+119%
80−85
−119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
World of Tanks 200−210
+122%
90−95
−122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Counter-Strike 2 44
+144%
18−20
−144%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+113%
45−50
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+117%
60−65
−117%
Metro Exodus 91
+128%
40−45
−128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+129%
24−27
−129%
Valorant 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
Dota 2 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Elden Ring 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Grand Theft Auto V 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Metro Exodus 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+116%
45−50
−116%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+111%
18−20
−111%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Fortnite 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+143%
30−33
−143%
Valorant 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%

This is how Arc A580 and RX 6300 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 129% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 129% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 136% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.00 14.69
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 32 Watt

Arc A580 has a 111% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6300, on the other hand, has 446.9% lower power consumption.

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A580
Arc A580
AMD Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 331 vote

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.