Arc A550M vs Radeon RX 6300M

Radeon RX 6300M Radeon RX 6450M Radeon RX 6500M Radeon RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550S
VS
Arc A350M Arc A370M Arc A380M Arc A530M Arc A550M Arc A570M Arc A730M Arc A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6300M and Arc A550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6300M
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
14.37

Arc A550M outperforms RX 6300M by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX 6300M RX 6300M
Arc A550M Arc A550M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking339235
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency32.4328.01
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 24DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed2000 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate115.2262.4
Floating-point processing power3.686 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Cores1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−57.5%
60−65
+57.5%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−50.6%
130−140
+50.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−57.5%
60−65
+57.5%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−37.3%
90−95
+37.3%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−50.6%
130−140
+50.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−45.3%
75−80
+45.3%
Fortnite 85−90
−33.3%
110−120
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−43.1%
90−95
+43.1%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−48%
70−75
+48%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−55.2%
90−95
+55.2%
Valorant 120−130
−27.8%
160−170
+27.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−57.5%
60−65
+57.5%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−37.3%
90−95
+37.3%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−50.6%
130−140
+50.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−22.9%
250−260
+22.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Dota 2 95−100
−25%
120−130
+25%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−45.3%
75−80
+45.3%
Fortnite 85−90
−33.3%
110−120
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−43.1%
90−95
+43.1%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−48%
70−75
+48%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−44.1%
85−90
+44.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−54.5%
50−55
+54.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−55.2%
90−95
+55.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−60.5%
65−70
+60.5%
Valorant 120−130
−27.8%
160−170
+27.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−37.3%
90−95
+37.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Dota 2 95−100
−25%
120−130
+25%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−45.3%
75−80
+45.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−43.1%
90−95
+43.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−55.2%
90−95
+55.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−60.5%
65−70
+60.5%
Valorant 120−130
−27.8%
160−170
+27.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
−33.3%
110−120
+33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−64.5%
50−55
+64.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−42.6%
160−170
+42.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−61.5%
40−45
+61.5%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−55%
30−35
+55%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−15.2%
170−180
+15.2%
Valorant 150−160
−27.2%
200−210
+27.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−47.7%
65−70
+47.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−51.4%
50−55
+51.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−53.8%
60−65
+53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−48.3%
40−45
+48.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Valorant 85−90
−55.2%
130−140
+55.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 55−60
−38.2%
75−80
+38.2%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−51.9%
40−45
+51.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−66.7%
24−27
+66.7%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A550M is 92% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A550M surpassed RX 6300M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.37 21.28
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 60 Watt

RX 6300M has 71.4% lower power consumption.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 48.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Arc A550M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6300M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 6300M
Radeon RX 6300M
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Arc A550M Arc A550M
vs
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
vs
GTX 680M SLI GeForce GTX 680M SLI
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
vs
RX 6500M RX 6500M
RTX 4070 RTX 4070
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M
Steam Deck GPU Steam Deck GPU
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M
RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M
Arc A730M Arc A730M
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT
vs
RX 6300M 6300M
RX 6500 RX 6500
vs
RX 6300M 6300M
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 81 vote

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6300M or Arc A550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.