Radeon RX 6300M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
VS
Radeon RX 6300M Radeon RX 6450M Radeon RX 6500M Radeon RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and Radeon RX 6300M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
16.58
+0.5%

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms RX 6300M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
RX 6300M RX 6300M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking336337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.1132.84
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed1035 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate76.80115.2
Floating-point processing power2.458 TFLOPS3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6448
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.58
+0.5%
RX 6300M 16.49

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6458
+0.6%
RX 6300M 6421

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
1440p41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
4K26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+5.7%
50−55
−5.7%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0.5%
200−210
−0.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 112
+16.7%
95−100
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 51
−3.9%
50−55
+3.9%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+13.6%
55−60
−13.6%
Metro Exodus 31
−6.5%
30−35
+6.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+25.6%
40−45
−25.6%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 106
+10.4%
95−100
−10.4%
Far Cry 5 48
−10.4%
50−55
+10.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−34.4%
40−45
+34.4%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0.7%
150−160
−0.7%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
−16%
27−30
+16%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−10%
21−24
+10%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 52
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Far Cry 5 16
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and RX 6300M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 5% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 3% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 8% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 26% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6300M is 34% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
  • RX 6300M is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
  • there's a draw in 49 tests (73%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.58 16.49
Recency 2 April 2020 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a 0.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and Radeon RX 6300M.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 6300M
Radeon RX 6300M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
GTX 680M SLI GeForce GTX 680M SLI
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB 3070 Ti 16 GB
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 3050 8 GB GA107
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Graphics 96EU
GTX 680M SLI NVIDIA GTX 680M SLI
vs
RX 6300M 6300M
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
GeForce 940MX 940MX
Quadro M5500 Quadro M5500
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 3050 Mobile Refresh
GTX 970M SLI NVIDIA GTX 970M SLI
vs
RX 6400 6400
GTX 980M NVIDIA GTX 980M
vs
UHD Graphics 750 Graphics 750
GTX 980M NVIDIA GTX 980M
vs
Steam Deck 8CU Deck 8CU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 215 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q or Radeon RX 6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.