GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon RX 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 with GeForce GTX 680M, including specs and performance data.

RX 580
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 185 Watt
22.95
+173%

RX 580 outperforms GTX 680M by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking241500
Place by popularity1not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.933.63
Power efficiency8.655.86
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePolaris 20GK104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)4 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $310.50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580 has 421% better value for money than GTX 680M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041344
Core clock speed1257 MHz719 MHz
Boost clock speed1340 MHz758 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate193.084.90
Floating-point processing power6.175 TFLOPS2.038 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs144112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 22.95
+173%
GTX 680M 8.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 580 8855
+173%
GTX 680M 3239

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 580 19274
+227%
GTX 680M 5898

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 580 44344
+106%
GTX 680M 21534

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 580 13927
+244%
GTX 680M 4049

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 580 82516
+198%
GTX 680M 27684

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p180−190
+169%
67
−169%
Full HD94
+46.9%
64
−46.9%
1440p44
+175%
16−18
−175%
4K37
+208%
12−14
−208%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.444.85
1440p5.2019.41
4K6.1925.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+185%
12−14
−185%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+190%
20−22
−190%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%
Battlefield 5 138
+452%
24−27
−452%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+176%
16−18
−176%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+185%
12−14
−185%
Far Cry 5 83
+337%
18−20
−337%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
+261%
21−24
−261%
Forza Horizon 4 294
+435%
55−60
−435%
Hitman 3 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+130%
45−50
−130%
Metro Exodus 111
+344%
24−27
−344%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+161%
21−24
−161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 122
+336%
27−30
−336%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+70.7%
55−60
−70.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 101
+405%
20−22
−405%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%
Battlefield 5 113
+352%
24−27
−352%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+176%
16−18
−176%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+185%
12−14
−185%
Far Cry 5 69
+263%
18−20
−263%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
+178%
21−24
−178%
Forza Horizon 4 270
+391%
55−60
−391%
Hitman 3 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+130%
45−50
−130%
Metro Exodus 87
+248%
24−27
−248%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+161%
21−24
−161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+175%
27−30
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+108%
24−27
−108%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+70.7%
55−60
−70.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 34
+70%
20−22
−70%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+176%
16−18
−176%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+185%
12−14
−185%
Far Cry 5 49
+158%
18−20
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%
Hitman 3 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+130%
45−50
−130%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+175%
27−30
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+70.7%
55−60
−70.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+161%
21−24
−161%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+294%
30−35
−294%
Hitman 3 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+176%
16−18
−176%
Metro Exodus 53
+382%
10−12
−382%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+513%
8−9
−513%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+149%
50−55
−149%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 37
+429%
7−8
−429%
Far Cry New Dawn 22
+267%
6−7
−267%
Hitman 3 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+284%
30−35
−284%
Metro Exodus 33
+450%
6−7
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+440%
5−6
−440%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+310%
10−11
−310%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%

This is how RX 580 and GTX 680M compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 is 169% faster in 900p
  • RX 580 is 47% faster in 1080p
  • RX 580 is 175% faster in 1440p
  • RX 580 is 208% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 580 is 575% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 580 surpassed GTX 680M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.95 8.40
Recency 18 April 2017 4 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 100 Watt

RX 580 has a 173.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 680M, on the other hand, has 85% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 680M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 680M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GeForce GTX 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 19113 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 45 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.