GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R9 M470X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M470X and GeForce GTX 680M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M470X
2016
4 GB GDDR5
8.40
+0.8%

R9 M470X outperforms GTX 680M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking472475
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.65
ArchitectureGCN 2 (2016)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameEmeraldN13E-GTX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 May 2016 (8 years ago)4 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$310.50
Current priceno data$293 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961344
CUDA coresno data1344
Core clock speed1100 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz758 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate61.6080.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance1,971 gflops2,038 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M470X and GeForce GTX 680M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M470X 8.40
+0.8%
GTX 680M 8.33

Radeon R9 M470X outperforms GeForce GTX 680M by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M470X 3244
+0.9%
GTX 680M 3216

Radeon R9 M470X outperforms GeForce GTX 680M by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p65−70
−3.1%
67
+3.1%
Full HD65−70
−6.2%
69
+6.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 no data
Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 no data
Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 no data
Hitman 3 4−5 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 no data

This is how R9 M470X and GTX 680M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680M is 3% faster in 900p
  • GTX 680M is 6% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.40 8.33
Recency 14 May 2016 4 June 2012

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M470X and GeForce GTX 680M.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M470X
Radeon R9 M470X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GeForce GTX 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M470X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 44 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.