GeForce MX330 vs Radeon RX 5600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5600M and GeForce MX330, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5600M
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
19.73
+265%

RX 5600M outperforms MX330 by a whopping 265% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking260595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.4342.83
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 10GP108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 July 2020 (4 years ago)10 February 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304384
Core clock speed1035 MHz1531 MHz
Boost clock speed1265 MHz1594 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate182.238.26
Floating-point processing power5.829 TFLOPS1.224 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs14424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5600M 19.73
+265%
GeForce MX330 5.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5600M 8817
+265%
GeForce MX330 2415

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5600M 24213
+401%
GeForce MX330 4834

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5600M 17653
+369%
GeForce MX330 3762

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5600M 72335
+249%
GeForce MX330 20729

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 5600M 5934
+412%
GeForce MX330 1160

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD84
+282%
22
−282%
1440p57
+307%
14−16
−307%
4K31
+34.8%
23
−34.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+359%
27−30
−359%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+283%
12−14
−283%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
Battlefield 5 114
+293%
29
−293%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+359%
27−30
−359%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+283%
12−14
−283%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+213%
23
−213%
Fortnite 110−120
+74.6%
63
−74.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+181%
31
−181%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+331%
16−18
−331%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+277%
21−24
−277%
Valorant 150−160
+30.5%
118
−30.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
Battlefield 5 112
+387%
23
−387%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+359%
27−30
−359%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+149%
95−100
−149%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+283%
12−14
−283%
Dota 2 107
+52.9%
70
−52.9%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+380%
15
−380%
Fortnite 110−120
+224%
34
−224%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+295%
22
−295%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+331%
16−18
−331%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+276%
21−24
−276%
Metro Exodus 59
+436%
11
−436%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+277%
21−24
−277%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 104
+447%
19
−447%
Valorant 150−160
+45.3%
106
−45.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 106
+458%
19
−458%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+283%
12−14
−283%
Dota 2 104
+62.5%
64
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 80
+471%
14
−471%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+444%
16
−444%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+277%
21−24
−277%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+433%
12
−433%
Valorant 115
+71.6%
65−70
−71.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+424%
21
−424%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+240%
45−50
−240%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+368%
35−40
−368%
Valorant 190−200
+191%
65−70
−191%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 82
+811%
9−10
−811%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+345%
10−12
−345%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+293%
14−16
−293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+129%
16−18
−129%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Valorant 120−130
+313%
30−33
−313%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+925%
4−5
−925%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Dota 2 70−75
+200%
24
−200%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%

This is how RX 5600M and GeForce MX330 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600M is 282% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5600M is 307% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5600M is 35% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5600M is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 5600M surpassed GeForce MX330 in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.73 5.40
Recency 7 July 2020 10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 10 Watt

RX 5600M has a 265.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce MX330, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX330 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GeForce MX330

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 237 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2246 votes

Rate GeForce MX330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5600M or GeForce MX330, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.