GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Radeon RX 560 Mobile

Place in the ranking	419	490
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.67	no data
Power efficiency	14.08	3.02
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Baffin	N12E-GTX2
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	5 January 2017 (7 years ago)	6 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$99.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	768
Core clock speed	1175 MHz	620 MHz
Boost clock speed	1275 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	2x 100 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	56	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
Optimus	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 560 Mobile 11.29
+28.3%

GTX 675M SLI 8.80

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 560 Mobile 8329
+30%

GTX 675M SLI 6407

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	43 +43.3%	30−35 −43.3%
4K	36 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.33	no data
4K	2.78	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18
+21.4%

14−16

−21.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +30.8%	12−14 −30.8%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	33 +65%	20−22 −65%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +24%	24−27 −24%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +27.1%	55−60 −27.1%
Hitman 3	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +20%	50−55 −20%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +27.6%	27−30 −27.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +13.6%	55−60 −13.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +30.8%	12−14 −30.8%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	28 +40%	20−22 −40%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +24%	24−27 −24%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +27.1%	55−60 −27.1%
Hitman 3	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +20%	50−55 −20%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +27.6%	27−30 −27.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +16%	24−27 −16%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +13.6%	55−60 −13.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +30.8%	12−14 −30.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	21 +5%	20−22 −5%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +27.1%	55−60 −27.1%
Hitman 3	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +20%	50−55 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +27.6%	27−30 −27.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 −25%	24−27 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +13.6%	55−60 −13.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+29.2%

24−27

−29.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +30.8%	12−14 −30.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +47.2%	35−40 −47.2%
Hitman 3	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +26.8%	55−60 −26.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+26.7%

14−16

−26.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Hitman 3	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +50%	30−35 −50%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11
+11.1%

9−10

−11.1%

This is how RX 560 Mobile and GTX 675M SLI compete in popular games:

RX 560 Mobile is 43% faster in 1080p
RX 560 Mobile is 33% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 560 Mobile is 89% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games: