Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs RX 560 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560 Mobile and Radeon RX 560X Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 560 Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
11.21
+3.5%

RX 560 Mobile outperforms RX 560X Mobile by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking419424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.67no data
Power efficiency13.9811.43
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameBaffinPolaris 21
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2017 (7 years ago)11 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961024
Core clock speed1175 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHz1202 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate58.9781.60
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPS2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs5664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1450 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s92.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 560 Mobile 11.21
+3.5%
RX 560X Mobile 10.83

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 560 Mobile 8329
+1.4%
RX 560X Mobile 8212

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 560 Mobile 5738
RX 560X Mobile 6329
+10.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 560 Mobile 36528
+2.9%
RX 560X Mobile 35511

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
+26.5%
34
−26.5%
4K36
+20%
30−35
−20%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.33no data
4K2.78no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−35.3%
23
+35.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+8%
25
−8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−76.5%
30
+76.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−36.1%
49
+36.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
−6.1%
35
+6.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−35.5%
42
+35.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−45.3%
109
+45.3%
Hitman 3 21−24
−14.3%
24
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−21.6%
45
+21.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−51.6%
47
+51.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−51.4%
56
+51.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−81.5%
49
+81.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−23.5%
21
+23.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
36
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+13.3%
15
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 28
−3.6%
29
+3.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+10.7%
28
−10.7%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−40%
105
+40%
Hitman 3 21−24
−9.5%
23
+9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+2.8%
36
−2.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−13.5%
42
+13.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+30.8%
13
−30.8%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+97.4%
38
−97.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−10%
22
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+509%
11
−509%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.3%
30
−3.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how RX 560 Mobile and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 560 Mobile is 26% faster in 1080p
  • RX 560 Mobile is 20% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 560 Mobile is 509% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 560X Mobile is 81% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 560 Mobile is ahead in 22 tests (31%)
  • RX 560X Mobile is ahead in 17 tests (24%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.21 10.83
Recency 5 January 2017 11 April 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 65 Watt

RX 560 Mobile has a 3.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

RX 560X Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 560 Mobile and Radeon RX 560X Mobile.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile
Radeon RX 560 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 54 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 415 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.