GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon RX 550 Mobile

Place in the ranking	554	1027
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.47	0.01
Power efficiency	9.71	1.32
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	Lexa	GT215
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 July 2017 (7 years ago)	17 November 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79.99	$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 550 Mobile has 44600% better value for money than GT 240.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	96
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1287 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,200 million	727 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	69 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105C C
Texture fill rate	51.48	17.60
Floating-point processing power	1.647 TFLOPS	0.2573 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	40	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB or 1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	54.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	DVIVGAHDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.4	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.2
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−56.3%

25
+56.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

5.00

3.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10
+150%

4−5

−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8 +700%	1−2 −700%
Battlefield 5	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Hitman 3	12 +100%	6−7 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +193%	14−16 −193%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +850%	2−3 −850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +188%	8−9 −188%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +60.6%	30−35 −60.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8 +700%	1−2 −700%
Battlefield 5	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Hitman 3	12 +100%	6−7 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +193%	14−16 −193%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +850%	2−3 −850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24 +200%	8−9 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +60.6%	30−35 −60.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Hitman 3	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +193%	14−16 −193%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +100%	8−9 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24 +118%	10−12 −118%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4 −725%	30−35 +725%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+850%

2−3

−850%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%
Hitman 3	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +633%	6−7 −633%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+200%

4−5

−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6	0−1
Hitman 3	3−4	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+133%

3−4

−133%

This is how RX 550 Mobile and GT 240 compete in popular games:

GT 240 is 56% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 550 Mobile is 2200% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 240 is 725% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 550 Mobile is ahead in 47 tests (98%)
GT 240 is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.96	1.31
Recency	2 July 2017	17 November 2009
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB or 1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	69 Watt

RX 550 Mobile has a 431.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 38% lower power consumption.

GT 240, on the other hand, has a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon RX 550 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 240 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GT 240 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.