Radeon RX 7600S vs R9 270X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 270X with Radeon RX 7600S, including specs and performance data.

R9 270X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
12.69

RX 7600S outperforms R9 270X by a whopping 205% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking396120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.78no data
Power efficiency4.8535.58
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCuracaoNavi 33
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate84.00246.4
Floating-point processing power2.688 TFLOPS15.77 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270X 12.69
RX 7600S 38.76
+205%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 270X 4877
RX 7600S 14901
+206%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 270X 6560
RX 7600S 25900
+295%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−233%
100
+233%
1440p14−16
−229%
46
+229%
4K8−9
−225%
26
+225%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.63no data
1440p14.21no data
4K24.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−330%
99
+330%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−232%
80−85
+232%
Elden Ring 35−40
−258%
130−140
+258%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−154%
100−110
+154%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−261%
83
+261%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−108%
52
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−347%
228
+347%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−166%
90−95
+166%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−138%
75−80
+138%
Valorant 50−55
−318%
209
+318%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−154%
100−110
+154%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−226%
75
+226%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−68%
42
+68%
Dota 2 45−50
−165%
122
+165%
Elden Ring 35−40
−282%
145
+282%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−14.3%
56
+14.3%
Fortnite 70−75
−136%
170−180
+136%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−273%
190
+273%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−180%
126
+180%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−166%
90−95
+166%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−113%
200−210
+113%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−138%
75−80
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Valorant 50−55
−210%
150−160
+210%
World of Tanks 170−180
−62.2%
270−280
+62.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−154%
100−110
+154%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−143%
56
+143%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−40%
35
+40%
Dota 2 45−50
−139%
110
+139%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−98%
95−100
+98%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−220%
163
+220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−113%
200−210
+113%
Valorant 50−55
−258%
179
+258%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−324%
70−75
+324%
Elden Ring 18−20
−300%
76
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−300%
70−75
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−106%
170−180
+106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−245%
35−40
+245%
World of Tanks 90−95
−173%
240−250
+173%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−188%
70−75
+188%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−100%
24
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−133%
21
+133%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−331%
120−130
+331%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−273%
110−120
+273%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−211%
80−85
+211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−319%
65−70
+319%
Valorant 30−35
−290%
120−130
+290%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Dota 2 21−24
−230%
75−80
+230%
Elden Ring 8−9
−363%
37
+363%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−230%
75−80
+230%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−238%
120−130
+238%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−230%
75−80
+230%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9
+200%
Dota 2 21−24
−230%
75−80
+230%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−256%
55−60
+256%
Fortnite 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−276%
60−65
+276%
Valorant 12−14
−392%
60−65
+392%

This is how R9 270X and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600S is 233% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600S is 229% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600S is 225% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600S is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7600S surpassed R9 270X in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.69 38.76
Recency 8 October 2013 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 75 Watt

RX 7600S has a 205.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 270X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 270X is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7600S is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Radeon RX 7600S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 752 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 219 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.