Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 vs Radeon R7 M270

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking895not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameOpal XT / MarsGMA 600
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2014 (10 years ago)1 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844
Core clock speed825 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Texture fill rate19.80no data
Floating-point performance0.6336 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot Listedno data
Maximum RAM amount0 MBno data
Memory bus widthNot Listedno data
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 119.0c
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2014 1 May 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

R7 M270 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M270 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M270
Radeon R7 M270
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 17 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.