Arc A530M vs Radeon RX 6650 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650 XT with Arc A530M, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650 XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 176 Watt
44.60
+152%

RX 6650 XT outperforms Arc A530M by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking78304
Place by popularity98not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation62.46no data
Power efficiency17.6719.01
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 23DG2-256
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2022 (2 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Core clock speed2055 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed2635 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)176 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate337.3124.8
Floating-point processing power10.79 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs12896
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Cores3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2190 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.3 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6650 XT 44.60
+152%
Arc A530M 17.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6650 XT 17205
+152%
Arc A530M 6836

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140
+155%
55−60
−155%
1440p66
+175%
24−27
−175%
4K37
+164%
14−16
−164%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.85no data
1440p6.05no data
4K10.78no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 128
+6300%
2−3
−6300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+3033%
3−4
−3033%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+160%
55−60
−160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+4350%
2−3
−4350%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+5300%
2−3
−5300%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+169%
35−40
−169%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+154%
80−85
−154%
Hitman 3 95−100
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+2163%
8−9
−2163%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+174%
50−55
−174%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+4100%
4−5
−4100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+386%
27−30
−386%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+3033%
3−4
−3033%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+160%
55−60
−160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+4350%
2−3
−4350%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+169%
35−40
−169%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+154%
80−85
−154%
Hitman 3 95−100
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+2163%
8−9
−2163%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+174%
50−55
−174%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 222
+5450%
4−5
−5450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+922%
9−10
−922%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+386%
27−30
−386%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+3033%
3−4
−3033%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+4350%
2−3
−4350%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+3800%
2−3
−3800%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+169%
35−40
−169%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+154%
80−85
−154%
Hitman 3 95−100
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 173
+2063%
8−9
−2063%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 193
+4725%
4−5
−4725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+1089%
9−10
−1089%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65
+132%
27−30
−132%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Cyberpunk 2077 44 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+155%
95−100
−155%
Hitman 3 60−65
+900%
6−7
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 129
+6350%
2−3
−6350%
Metro Exodus 114
+153%
45−50
−153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 124
+176%
45−50
−176%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+152%
27−30
−152%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+158%
80−85
−158%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+3750%
2−3
−3750%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Hitman 3 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+161%
75−80
−161%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+167%
21−24
−167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+157%
7−8
−157%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+167%
24−27
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 23
+156%
9−10
−156%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%

This is how RX 6650 XT and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 155% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 175% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 164% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650 XT is 6350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6650 XT surpassed Arc A530M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.60 17.72
Recency 10 May 2022 1 August 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 176 Watt 65 Watt

RX 6650 XT has a 151.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 170.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A530M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop card while Arc A530M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3350 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 191 vote

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.