Radeon R7 M265DX vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1026
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGMA 600Topaz
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2010 (14 years ago)12 October 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4384
Core clock speed400 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data940 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data22.56
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2010 12 October 2014
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm

R7 M265DX has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 and Radeon R7 M265DX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 is a notebook card while Radeon R7 M265DX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
Radeon R7 M265DX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.