A100 PCIe 80 GB vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking402not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 22GA100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date24 April 2018 (6 years ago)28 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12806912
Core clock speed931 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88609.1
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs32160
TMUs80432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB80 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s2,039 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2018 28 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 250 Watt

Pro WX Vega M GL has 284.6% lower power consumption.

A100 PCIe 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and A100 PCIe 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation card while A100 PCIe 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
A100 PCIe 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 68 votes

Rate A100 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.