Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL provides acceptable gaming and benchmark performance at 12.38% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 5090.
Summary
AMD started Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL sales 24 April 2018. This is a GCN 4.0 architecture notebook card based on 14 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 4 GB of HBM2 memory clocked at 0.7 GHz are supplied, and together with 1024 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 179.2 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is an integrated graphics card. Power consumption is at 65 Watt.
Primary details
Some basic facts about Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in the ranking | 410 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Power efficiency | 13.06 | of 100.00 (Radeon 890M) |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | |
| GPU code name | Polaris 22 | |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | |
| Release date | 24 April 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090) |
| Core clock speed | 931 MHz | of 2670 MHz (Arc B580) |
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | of 3599 MHz (Radeon RX 7990 XTX) |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | of 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | of 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 | of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.588 TFLOPS | of 104.8 (GeForce RTX 5090) |
| ROPs | 32 | of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) |
| TMUs | 80 | of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
Form factor & compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | of 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X) |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | of 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | of 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Shared memory | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
APIs supported by Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
Send your test results of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 52 | |
| 4K | 18 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 27−30 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 27−30 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40 | |
| Fortnite | 65−70 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45 | |
| Valorant | 100−110 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 27−30 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | |
| Dota 2 | 75−80 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40 | |
| Fortnite | 65−70 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45 | |
| Metro Exodus | 24−27 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 44 | |
| Valorant | 100−110 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | |
| Dota 2 | 75−80 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24 | |
| Valorant | 100−110 |
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 65−70 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 85−90 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20 | |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 75−80 | |
| Valorant | 120−130 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 24−27 |
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 10−11 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24 | |
| Metro Exodus | 7−8 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 15 | |
| Valorant | 60−65 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | |
| Dota 2 | 40−45 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 9−10 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−12 |
NVIDIA equivalent
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is T550 Mobile, which is faster by 1% and higher by 5 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL according to our statistics.
