Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs GeForce GTX 490

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.12
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameGF100Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480 ×2512
Core clock speed608 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)365 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate36.48 ×232.00
Floating-point processing power1.166 TFLOPS ×21.024 TFLOPS
ROPs48 ×28
TMUs60 ×232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed854 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth164.0 GB/s ×2no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 365 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 950 has a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 2333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 490 and Iris Plus Graphics 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 490
GeForce GTX 490
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 37 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 490 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 490 or Iris Plus Graphics 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.