Playstation 5 GPU vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking573not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.41no data
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)
GPU code namePolaris 12Oberon Plus
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date26 September 2019 (4 years ago)28 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402304
Core clock speed1082 MHz2233 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2233 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate41.44321.6
Floating-point processing power1.658 gflops10.29 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Lengthno data390 mm
WidthMXM ModuleIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 September 2019 28 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 176.9% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Playstation 5 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card while Playstation 5 GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
AMD Playstation 5 GPU
Playstation 5 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 76 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1729 votes

Rate Playstation 5 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.