Radeon Graphics vs 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 630 with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 630
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.88
+98%

630 outperforms Graphics by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking706904
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Power efficiency5.419.11
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 23Renoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512448
Core clock speed1082 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1218 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate38.9842.00
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3228

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 630 3.88
+98%
Radeon Graphics 1.96

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 630 1512
+97.9%
Radeon Graphics 764

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Valorant 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Dota 2 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Fortnite 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Valorant 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
World of Tanks 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Dota 2 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Valorant 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
World of Tanks 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Valorant 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Valorant 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.88 1.96
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 630 has a 98% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 33 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 6835 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.