Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking578not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.41no data
Power efficiency6.60no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 23Viola
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2019 (5 years ago)7 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6403840
Core clock speed1082 MHz2180 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt232 Watt
Texture fill rate34.62564.0
Floating-point processing power1.385 TFLOPS36.1 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Lengthno data386 mm
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2019 7 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 232 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 256.9% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card while Playstation 5 Pro GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 84 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 59 votes

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.