GeForce RTX 5080 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking397not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.46no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameVega 12GB203
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 November 2018 (6 years ago)2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102410752
Core clock speed815 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2520 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate76.16846.7
Floating-point processing power2.437 TFLOPS54.19 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs64336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth307.2 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-9.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 350 Watt

Pro Vega 16 has 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and GeForce RTX 5080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5080 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
GeForce RTX 5080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 72 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.