GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
23.96
+1.2%

Pro 5600M outperforms RTX 3050 Mobile by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking233236
Place by popularitynot in top-10045
Power efficiency32.8521.64
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 12GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1000 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1057 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate164.867.65
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs6440
TMUs16064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5600M 23.96
+1.2%
RTX 3050 Mobile 23.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5600M 9232
+1.2%
RTX 3050 Mobile 9122

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
−3.3%
93
+3.3%
1440p50−55
+0%
50
+0%
4K30−35
−10%
33
+10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−172%
106
+172%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−82.9%
75
+82.9%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−113%
83
+113%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+1.6%
60−65
−1.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0.7%
140−150
−0.7%
Hitman 3 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+1.2%
80−85
−1.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+1.6%
60−65
−1.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−51.2%
62
+51.2%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−56.4%
61
+56.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+1.6%
60−65
−1.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0.7%
140−150
−0.7%
Hitman 3 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+1.2%
80−85
−1.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+1.6%
60−65
−1.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−51.9%
123
+51.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−29.3%
53
+29.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−56.4%
61
+56.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0.7%
140−150
−0.7%
Hitman 3 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+3.7%
107
−3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−30.9%
106
+30.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−25%
65
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+42.3%
71
−42.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+1.6%
60−65
−1.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−73.9%
40
+73.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−100%
30
+100%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+1.5%
130−140
−1.5%
Hitman 3 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−59.2%
78
+59.2%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−53.3%
69
+53.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−50%
78
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0.7%
130−140
−0.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
−78.9%
34
+78.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0.8%
120−130
−0.8%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−69.2%
44
+69.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−84.6%
24
+84.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−100%
12
+100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−55.2%
45
+55.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−72.7%
19
+72.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how Pro 5600M and RTX 3050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 42% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 172% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 34 tests (47%)
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 21 test (29%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.96 23.67
Recency 15 June 2020 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 1.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 5600M and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 4617 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.