Quadro T600 Mobile vs Radeon HD 7450M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7450M with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 7450M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 7 Watt
0.85

T600 Mobile outperforms HD 7450M by a whopping 2055% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1126296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.7633.04
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSeymourTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2012 (12 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160896
Core clock speed700 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors370 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate5.60078.96
Floating-point processing power0.224 TFLOPS2.527 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7450M 0.85
T600 Mobile 18.32
+2055%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7450M 329
T600 Mobile 7071
+2049%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7450M 2281
T600 Mobile 39112
+1615%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7450M 582
T600 Mobile 10498
+1705%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−2450%
51
+2450%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Far Cry 5 0−1 53
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hitman 3 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−583%
80−85
+583%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−657%
53
+657%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−165%
80−85
+165%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Far Cry 5 0−1 49
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hitman 3 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−583%
80−85
+583%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−457%
39
+457%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−420%
52
+420%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−165%
80−85
+165%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Far Cry 5 0−1 45
Hitman 3 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1983%
250−260
+1983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−180%
28
+180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−165%
80−85
+165%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2025%
85−90
+2025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 8−9
Far Cry 5 0−1 9−10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how HD 7450M and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 2450% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T600 Mobile is 4400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is ahead in 28 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 18.32
Recency 7 January 2012 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 40 Watt

HD 7450M has 471.4% lower power consumption.

T600 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2055.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7450M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7450M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Radeon HD 7450M
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 52 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7450M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.